Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for management of the third stage of labor in a Nigerian hospital.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2015

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Journal of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral misoprostol with that of oxytocin for active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL). Methods: A double-blind randomized control trial was undertaken at a center in Ilorin, Nigeria, between January and June 2013. Every other eligible patient (in the first stage of labor at term, to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery, and no/low risk of postpartum hemorrhage [PPH]) were randomly assigned with computer-generated random numbers to receive oral misoprostol (600 μg) plus placebo injection or oral placebo plus oxytocin injection (1 mL of 10 IU) in the third stage of labor. The primary outcome was amount of blood loss during delivery. Results: Mean postpartum blood loss was 325.85 ± 164.72 mL in the 100 patients givenmisoprostol and 303.95±163.33 mL in the 100 patients given oxytocin (P=0.391). PPH(≥500mL blood loss) was recorded in 15 (15.0%) patients given misoprostol and 14 (14.0%) given oxytocin (P = 0.841). Shivering, pyrexia, and diarrhea were all significantly more common in the misoprostol group (P b 0.01 for all). Conclusion: The efficacy of oral misoprostol was similar to that of intramuscular oxytocin. Adverse effects associatedwith misoprostol were transient and self-limiting. Thus, oral misoprostol is efficacious and a good alternative to oxytocin for AMTSL

Description

Keywords

Adverse effects Efficacy, Intramuscular oxytocin, Oral misoprostol, Third stage of labor

Citation

Musa, A.O, Ijaiya M.A, Saidu, R, Aboyeji, A.P, Jimoh, A.A, Adesina K.T& Abdul I.F (2015): Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for management of the third stage of labor in a Nigerian hospital. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 129(3); 227-230.

Collections