Show simple item record

Clinical profile of patients with uterine rupture at a tertiary facility in North Central Nigeria

dc.contributor.authorAdewale, Folorunsho
dc.contributor.authorAdeniran, Abiodun
dc.contributor.authorIjaiya, Munirdeen
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T08:03:14Z
dc.date.available2019-10-21T08:03:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.otherDoi: 10.4103/phmj.phmj_20_18
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2886
dc.description.abstractBackground: Uterine rupture is a major obstetric emergency and an important cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Aim: To determine the prevalence, clinical presentation, management options and pregnancy outcomes following uterine rupture. Methods: It is a 5-year, descriptive, retrospective study of parturients who had uterine rupture between 1 January 2011 and 31 December, 2015, at Federal Medical Centre, Bida, North Central Nigeria. The case files of all parturients who had uterine rupture during this period were retrieved from the Medical Records department, and relevant information including maternal age, risk factors for uterine rupture, presenting symptoms, site of rupture and the definitive treatment as well as maternal and neonatal outcome using a data collection sheet was entered into a computer with SPSS version 20.0, which was also used for the analysis. Results: The prevalence of uterine rupture was 1 in 202 deliveries (48/9,718); of these, 24 (50.0%) were aged 36–40 years and 28 (58.3%) were grandmultipara (parity ≥5); 42 (87.5%) cases had previous uterine scar, whereas  15 (31.3%) had labour augmentation with oxytocin while attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section. The common presenting complaints were intrapartum vaginal bleeding (24; 50%) and abdominal pain (10; 20.8%). The most common site of rupture was anterolateral (24; 50.0%), while the most common surgical intervention was uterine repair with bilateral tubal ligation (30; 62.5%). The case fatality rate was 18.8% (9/48), neonatal survival rate was 12.5% (6/48) and perinatal mortality rate was 875/1000 deliveries (42/48). Conclusion: Uterine rupture remains an important cause of poor pregnancy outcomes in low-income settings. Previous caesarean delivery is the most common risk factor; women attempting vaginal birth after caesarean delivery should be managed by skilled health personnel in facilities with provision for emergency surgical intervention.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNilen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourten_US
dc.subjectIntrapartum complicationsen_US
dc.subjectObstetric haemorrhageen_US
dc.subjectsevere maternal outcomeen_US
dc.subjectuterine ruptureen_US
dc.titleClinical profile of patients with uterine rupture at a tertiary facility in North Central Nigeriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record