Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Olaniran, Oyebayo"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Item
    Bayesian Additive Regression trees for Predicting Colon Cancer: Methodological Study (Validity Study)
    (Turkiye Klinikleri (10.5336), 2022-06-26) Olaniran, Oyebayo; Olaniran, Saidat; Popoola, Jumoke; Omekam, Ifeyinwa
    Objective: The occurrence of colon cancer starts in the inner wall of the large intestine. The survival of colon cancer patients strongly relies on early detection. Diagnosing colon cancer using clinical approaches often takes longer, especially in most developing countries with limited facilities. The recent use of microarray technology has presented a new approach for the oncologist to diagnose cancer cells using non-clinical machine learning methods. In this paper, the aim is to predict the status of colon cancer tissues using the Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) and 2 other machine learning methods. Material and Methods: The development and comparative analysis of BART alongside 2 other competing methods (Random Forest: RF and Gradient Boosting Machine: GBM) were implemented. The dataset used for the analysis is the microarray colon cancer data which consists of 2,000 gene expression measurements for 62 tissue samples. Results: The methods are compared based on overall metrics (accuracy, balance accuracy, detection rate, F-measure and AUC) and class-specific metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value). The overall metrics results showed that the best method is RF. The class-specific metrics results showed that BART is better than RF. Conclusion: On average, BART is more sensitive in detecting the presence of colon cancer cells, while RF is more accurate and specific in detecting the presence or absence of colon cancer cells.

University of Ilorin Library © 2024, All Right Reserved

  • Cookie settings
  • Send Feedback
  • with ❤ from dspace.ng