DOPTION OF COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) AND COMPRESSED BIOMETHANE GAS (CBG) AS ENERGY AND TRANSPORT FUELS IN NIGERIA: A REVIEW OF SAFETY, BENEFITS, AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
| dc.contributor.author | Muhibbu-Din, I. E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-28T11:49:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-28T11:49:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-31 | |
| dc.description | The adoption of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Compressed Biomethane Gas (CBG) as alternative energy carriers in the energy and transportation sectors has garnered increasing scholarly and industrial interest globally, driven by their potential for improved fuel availability, costeffectiveness, enhanced energy efficiency, and significant reductions in pollutant emissions (1-2). Both CNG and CBG are compressed gaseous fuels utilized in internal combustion engines, offering distinct environmental and performance advantages compared to conventional gasoline and diesel fuels. CNG, primarily composed of methane with minor fractions of other hydrocarbons (3), is typically sourced from subterranean natural gas reserves or as a byproduct of petroleum extraction, requiring compression to high pressures (200-250 bar) for efficient storage and transportation | |
| dc.description.abstract | The removal of fuel subsidies in Nigeria has heightened energy and transportation costs, intensifying inflationary pressures and economic instability. To address this, adopting alternative fuels particularly Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Compressed Biomethane Gas (CBG) offers a pathway toward energy diversification and resilience. This review systematically synthesizes academic and technical literature, including 45 studies published between 2010 and 2024, to assess the safety, environmental, economic, and energy security implications of transitioning from petroleum fuels to CNG and CBG. Findings reveal that while CBG provides superior environmental benefits and long-term sustainability, CNG remains more cost-effective for short-term implementation. The study identifies policy, infrastructure, and technological gaps limiting adoption and concludes with targeted recommendations to guide Nigeria’s sustainable energy transition strategy | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | self | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Muhibbu-Din, I. E. (2025). Adoption of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Compressed Biomethane Gas (CBG) as Energy and Transport Fuels in Nigeria: A Review of Safety, Benefits, and Implementation Strategies. Journal of Renewable Energy Engineering 3 (2), 43 - 50. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | p-issn /e-issn: /2986-1063/2988-554X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://uilspace.unilorin.edu.ng/handle/123456789/17746 | |
| dc.publisher | Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Indonesia | |
| dc.subject | Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) | |
| dc.subject | Compressed Biomethane Gas (CBG) | |
| dc.subject | Energy Security | |
| dc.subject | Environmental Sustainability | |
| dc.subject | Alternative Fuels | |
| dc.subject | Transportation. | |
| dc.title | DOPTION OF COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) AND COMPRESSED BIOMETHANE GAS (CBG) AS ENERGY AND TRANSPORT FUELS IN NIGERIA: A REVIEW OF SAFETY, BENEFITS, AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES | |
| dc.type | Article |