Raji, Wasiu OYongxin, GaoHarris, Jerry, M2023-05-242023-05-242017Raji, W. O., G. Yongxin, and J.M. Harris (2017): Wavefield Analysis of Crosswell Seismic Data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol 10:9, 1-9. (Q2) DOI: 10.1007/s12517-017-2964-6, 1-9.https://uilspace.unilorin.edu.ng/handle/20.500.12484/10783Despite the numerous advantages of crosswell seismic data over surface seismic data, crosswell seismic geophysics is still underutilized and underdeveloped. The factors limiting the full utilization of crosswell data include the lack of standardized methods for processing and imaging the data. This is because crosswell data is not completely understood. To improve the understanding of crosswell data, we performed acoustic and elastic modeling of a west Texas carbonate oilfield data using finite difference methods and crosswell geometry. To account for the different wave modes in the field data, we decomposed the full data into its constituent wave modes. Results of the forward modeling show that elastic synthetic data is a better representation of crosswell field data than the popular acoustic synthetic data.Wavefield decomposition gave insight into the time-space kinematics behavior of the different wave modes that constitute the full data. Overall, the study improved our understanding of crosswell field data. The learning from this study has been utilized to performdatadriven reflection enhancement processing where the discerned characteristic of different seismic arrival is utilize to suppress unwanted and enhanced the desired wave modes. The processing reduced the complex data to only up-going P-P reflections that can be imaged to reveal the subtle geological structures of the oilfield.enCross-well field dataElastic wavesAcoustic wavesFinite difference methodWavefield decompositionArticle